11/16/2010 · Court of Appeal, SCHLUMBERGER HOLDINGS LTD v ELECTROMAGNETIC GEOSERVICES AS, Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases, Volume 127, Issue 12, December 2010, Pages 851–915, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcq044, 8/6/2010 · On 28 July 2010, the Court of Appeal, lead by Lord Justice Jacob, handed down judgment on a case – Schlumberger Holdings Limited v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS [2010] EWCA Civ 819 – overturning the decision of Justice Mann in the High Court that European Patent (UK) 1 256 019 was obvious, thus maintaining the patent.
Schlumberger Holdings v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2010] EWCA Civ 819. A dispute about patents for electromagnetic seabed surveying. A key issue in the case was the identity of the person skilled in the art. Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal considered this topic in detail, the Court of Appeal giving a judgment, as surprising as it was …
1/19/2009 · Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS. Introduction. 1. This is a patent action whose subject matter is three patents (known in this action as the 019, 887 and 640 patents.
31047 Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS Patents Court (Floyd J, 17 January 2008) Civil Procedure Rules, r31 Rules of the Supreme Court, O.24 – revocation – application for disclosure of documents allegedly relevant to obviousness – ‘control’ of third party – relevance of documents ([2008] EWHC 56 (Pat)), Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) (Jul 28, 2010) Jul 28, 2010, 7/29/2010 · This was the main question posed in the case of Schlumberger Holdings L t d v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS [2010] EWCA Civ 819, the judgment of which was issued yesterday by the Court of Appeal. This resulted from an appeal from the judgment of Mr Justice Mann at the High Court (commented on at the time by the IPKat here ), who had found EMGS’s patents, relating to.
Case: Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS [2009] EWHC 773 Costs: Interesting times QM Legal Costs | Personal Injury Law Journal | May 2017 #155, 8/6/2010 · However, in the author’s view, the judgment of the Court of Appeal of 28 July 2010 in Schlumberger Holdings Limited v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS is likely to be cited frequently for many years at least for the clear guidance and shift in emphasis that it provides in two key areas of patent law: namely the identity of the skilled addressee and the importance of so-called ‘secondary evidence’.
11/30/2010 · Reversing a High Court decision on the invalidity of two patents, in Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS [2010] EWCA Civ 819, Lord Justice Jacob has held that the person …
